Analysis of Factors Affecting the Success of Agricultural Land Integration Plan (Case Study: Chubar Rural District, Shaft county)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MA in Geography and Rural Planning, Department of Geography, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

Abstract

The integration process in less developed or developing countries seems an undeniable necessity due to geography, economic growth, high rural population, deprivation, extreme poverty, unemployment, and inflation (which are common in these countries). Therefore, this study aimed to identify and analyze the factors affecting the success of the agricultural land integration project with an emphasis on global experiences. The research method was descriptive-analytical and applied. The data collection method was library and survey (observation and questionnaire - farmers and experts). The study area included 11 villages out of 35 villages in the Chubar rural district where the land integration plan has been implemented. The number of households in the Chubar district included in the land integration plan was 1137, from which 285 farmers were selected using the Morgan table. Also, 13 agricultural Jihad experts and 7 university professors were selected as the research population for the opinion polls. Findings of the research using the confirmatory factor analysis method showed that based on the coherence and integration of indicators, three influential factors in the implementation of land integration plan and its success were identified, named as follows: 1-The factor of new agricultural technologies with a factor weight of 1.7; 2- Productivity and employment indicators and the underlying factor, which is the management and productivity factor with a factor weight of 1.66; 3- The third influential factor from the experts' point of view is the mechanization factor with a factor weight of 1.464, which is obtained from the indicators of using machines and ease of access to devices and labor. It should be noted that according to the mentioned factors, the success rate of the agricultural land integration plan in Chubar village has been higher than average. 
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The rural economy is closely related to agricultural activities and land productivity. Severe land segmentation as one of the most important challenges of rural economy leads to a decrease in production and consequently individual incomes of farmers, economic and social instability and reduction of food security, decrease in employment and income, and the increase in migration in rural areas. The integration process in less developed or developing countries in terms of geographical status, economic growth rate, and also due to high rural population, deprivation, severe poverty, unemployment, and inflation (one of these countries' commonalities) seems to be an undeniable necessity. Today, the factors contributing to the success of agricultural land consolidation in new land management approaches are using scarce resources to achieve the desired result, the sustainable socio-economic revitalization, and political development emphasizing the "local community" factor. Therefore, increasing farmers' awareness about the economic and social outcomes and the transfer of useful information to farmers by promoters and government support programs to attract the participation of stakeholders and beneficiaries in both the decision-making and implementation stages is an undeniable necessity.
Methodology
The research method was descriptive-analytical and applied. The data collection method was library and survey (observation and questionnaire - farmers and experts). The study area included 11 villages out of 35 villages in the Chubar rural district where the land integration plan has been implemented. The number of households in the Chubar district included in the land integration plan was 1137, from which 285 farmers were selected using the Morgan table. Also, 13 agricultural Jihad experts and 7 university professors were chosen as the research population for the opinion polls.
Results and discussion
Findings of the research using the confirmatory factor analysis method showed that based on the coherence and integration of indicators, three influential factors in the implementation of land integration plan and its success were identified, named as follows: 1-The factor of new agricultural technologies with a factor weight of 1.7; 2- Productivity and employment indicators and the underlying factor, which is the management and productivity factor with a factor weight of 1.66; 3- The third influential factor from the experts' point of view is the mechanization factor with a factor weight of 1.464, which is obtained from the indicators of using machines and ease of access to devices and labor. The results were in line with Bouzarjomehri and Enzaei (2012), who acknowledged the implementation of the integration plan with the presence of effective criteria for achieving the quantitative and qualitative goals of the plan to achieve potential in rice production, taking measures to equip lands and exploiters to the new knowledge are essential. One of the things that contribute to the quantitative and qualitative development of rice cultivation was the successful implementation of the project in terms of technology. The result was also consistent with Rezaei Moghadam et al. (2014), that farmers with more access to the extension services on integration information had better attitudes and participation in the implementation of integration, therefore more willing to participate in the social activities.
Conclusion
In terms of institutionalism, by enacting a law on the property rights in agricultural lands, regardless of the political and social structures of the region, the government can not expect property rights to be observed there. Also, decentralization and leaving decisions on the local issues (development and construction projects) to local members, given that they have a clear picture of local facilities and conditions, is something that can be the beginning of low-level institutionalization and create competition and success of agricultural development projects (land consolidation). From the perspective of communication planning, planning should be operational in such a way that the opinion of all different groups of farmers in the villages is attracted, and the intra-group and out-of-group relationships and communication networks should be strengthened. On the one hand, developing capacity, and strengthening the capabilities of the society, empowers individuals, organizations, and groups in implementing and executing programs. Also, the presence and participation of local community residents is one of the main pillars in the implementation of development projects, so it is important to believe that social capital is the main factor in creating solidarity and collective interest among farmers and is the driving force behind all kinds of active social movements in different areas.
Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the persons for scientific consulting in this paper.

Highlights

  • Implementation of agricultural land integration project in Choobar sub-district of Shaft city, although it has been associated with several problems, but its success rate has been above average. Therefore, in terms of factors affecting the success of this project, it can be used as a basis for successful implementation of the project in other coastal areas.

Keywords


Akkaya Aslan, S. T., Gundogdu, K. S., Yaslioglu, E., Kirmikil, M., and Arici, I. A. (2007). Personal, Physical and Socioeconomic Factors Affecting Farmer’s Adoption of Land Consolidation. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2), pp. 204-213
Allahyaria, M. S., Christos, A. D., Daghighi Masouleh, Z., and Ghorbania, M. (2018(. Land consolidation success in paddy fields of northern Iran: An assessment based on farmers’ satisfaction.  journal homepage, Land Use Policy, 73, pp. 95–101.
Aref, F., Redzuan, M. (2009). Community leaders’ perceptions toward tourism impacts and level of building community capacity in tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), pp. 208-213.
Ashkar Ahangarkalai, M. A., Asadpour, H., and Alipour, A. (2006). A Survey of Farmers' Attitudes Towards Land Integration Plan in Mazandaran Rice Fields (Case Study of Glird Village, Joybar County). Agricultural Economics and Development, 14(55), pp. 135-154. [In Persian]
Basile, E., Cecchi, C. (2007), Building Social Capital in Rural Areas: Does Public Action Help?, Restructuring in Marginal Rural Areas (RESTRIM), The International Centre  for Development Studies, University of Aberdeen, GB.
Blaabjerg, E., Hartvigsen, M. (2003). Land Consolidation Project, Puskelnai Area, Lithuania Preliminary Study, Baseline Report, Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Land Consolidation Division.
Bouzarjomehri, K. h., Enzaei, E. (2012). Evaluation of Technological Performance of Equipping, Renovation and Integration of Paddy Lands (Case Study: Qara Taghan Village, Neka County). Quarterly Journal of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 4, pp. 39-58. [In Persian]
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N. (2005). Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity, Technical Paper 7. In: Adaptation policy Frameworks for climate change: Developing strategies, policies and measures, [Lim, B. and E. Spanger-siegfried (eds.)]. United Nation Development Programme and Cambridge Univesity Press, New York, NY: 165-182.
Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., and See, L. M. (2010). Towards an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation, Joint FIG Commission 3 and Commission7WorkshopInformation and Land Management, https://www.researchgate.net/publication.
Dinpanah, G. h. (2009). Investigating the effective factors on the tendency of rice farmers in Sari city towards land integration. Journal of Extension and Agricultural Economics, 2(2), pp. 52-39.
Einali, J. (2014). Evaluation of the role of social capital in the integration of agricultural lands (Case study: Hesar Vali Asr village of Avaj city). Rural Research, 5(2), pp. 375-396. [In Persian]
Esmaili Dastjerdipour, A; Chizari, M., and Seddiqi, H. (2014). Institutional Attitudes Towards Development in Agriculture. Quarterly Journal of Planning and Budget, 3 (126), p. 131-149. [In Persian]
Feizizadeh, B., Khedmatzadeh, A., and Nikjoo, M. R. (2018). Micro-classification of horticultural and agricultural lands using basic object processing techniques and fuzzy algorithms with the aim of estimating the area under cultivation. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 18(48), pp. 201-216. [In Persian]
Ghadiri Masoom, M., Zianoushin, M. M., and Khorasani, M. A. (2000). Economic Stability and its Relationship with Spatial-Spatial Properties (Case Study of Kouhin Villages in Kabudrahang County). Quarterly Journal of Village and Development, 3 (2), pp. 1-29. [In Persian]
Gonzales Garcia, I. (2007). Land consolidation in Spain: the land registry perspective. Effective and Sustainable land management- A permanent challenge for each society, UNECE WPLA Workshop, Session III-Social and Constitutional Dimension of Land Management, Munich, May 24-25.
Hadipoor, S. (2004). Spatial-Spatial Consequences of Agricultural Land Integration and Its Role in Rural Development (Case Study of Godin Village). Master Thesis in Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, 2004. [In Persian]
Hadizadeh Bazaz, M., Bouzarjomehri, K. h. (2015). Investigating the role of rural production cooperatives in increasing the technical and economic capability of farmers in rural areas of Neishabour county. Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Strategies, 2 (4), pp. 443-459. [In Persian]
Haqiqat, S., Irvani, H., Kalantari, K. h., Mahdavi, E., and Ghadimi, S. A. (2015). Analysis of the driving factors of land integration plan from the perspective of farmers in Fars province. Iranian Economic Economics and Development Research, 64(1), pp. 21-34. [In Persian]
Hasanzadeh, D. (2008). Community-based approach to the quality of life of local communities. Journal of Urban Management, 20, pp. 7-22. [In Persian]
Heidari Sareban, V., Majnuni Tutakhaneh, A. (2015). Investigating the role of social capacity building on the participation of villagers in development activities (Case study: Bonab city). Journal of Spatial Planning, 6(19), pp. 89-104. [In Persian]
Heidari Sareban, V., Rokn al-Din Eftekhari, A. (2015). Analysis of Factors Affecting Farmers' Empowerment (Case Study: Ardabil Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47(3), pp. 743-755. [In Persian]
Jahan Ramazan, F., Zarafshani, K., and Rostami, F. (2015). Investigating the Effects of Land Equipping, Renovation and Integration Plan on Food Security (Case Study: Mian Darband County, Kermanshah). Human Geography Research, 48 (3), pp. 507-521. [In Persian]
Jamshidi, A., Amini, M. A. (2009). The Role of Agricultural Extension and Education in Creating Farmers' Desire to Implement Land Integration Project (Case Study in Ilam Province), Proceedings of the Third Iranian Congress of Agricultural Extension and Education and Natural Resources, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2, pp. 1-15. [In Persian]
Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., and Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), pp. 135-149.
Kashi, K. h., Heidari, K. h. (2004). Survey of food security of Iranian households based on AHFSI index. Agricultural Economics and Development, 12 (48), pp. 155-182. [In Persian]
Lisec, A., Sevatdal, H., Bjerva, Qi., and Ferlan, M. (2012). Comparative Analysis between Slovenia and Norwa, FIG Working Week. The institutional framework of land Consolidation Land Use Policy, 27, pp. 545-549.
Mahdavi, I., Kiani, M., and Daneshvar Ameri, J. (2017). Assessing Barriers to Agricultural Land Integration (Case Study of Villages in Azna County). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 2-48 (2), pp. 333-342. [In Persian]
Narayan, D., Abe, K. (2004). Designing social funds (demand-driven participation, and local organizational capacity). Alireza Kashani, Tehran: Sarvestan, 128.
Nardone, G., Sisto, R., and Lopolito, A. (2010). Social Capital in the LEADER Initiative: amethodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, pp. 63–72.
Rezaei Moghadam, K., Rahimi, S., and Bakhshudeh, M. (2014). Individual, economic, social, environmental and agricultural factors affecting the integrated acceptance of agricultural lands (case study of Shiraz city). Agricultural Economics Research, 6 (22), pp. 135-157. [In Persian]
Riahi, V., Ziaian Firoozabadi, P., Azizpour, F., and Darouei, P. (2019). Determining the level of crop cultivation in Lenjanat area using satellite images. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 19(52), pp. 147-169. [In Persian]
Sevizy, M., Mohammadi, F. (2011). The Role of Social Capital in Ensuring Investment Security. Policy Guide Quarterly, 2 (3), pp. 119-146. [In Persian]
Shafiee, A., Farash Khiabani, M. (2011). Communication approach in urban planning; Theoretical and epistemological study. Abadi (Quarterly Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning), 72(73), pp. 1-21. [In Persian]
Shayan, H., Taghi Lou, A. A., and Khosrow Beigi, R. (2012). Analysis of the Role of People's Participation in the Sustainability of Rural Economy (Case Study: Ijroud County, Ijroud County). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 19, pp. 71-94. [In Persian]
Taqvaee, M. (1997). Introduction and temporal-spatial comparison of factors affecting the fragmentation and dispersion of agricultural lands and the issue of integration. Journal of Isfahan Faculty of Literature and Humanities, 9, pp. 1-34. [In Persian]
Thomas, J. (2004). Modern Land Consolidation- recent trends on land consolidation in Germany. Paper from FIG symposium on modern land consolidation, Volvic, France. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings.
Vermeziari, H., Rostami, F., and Groundi, S. h. (2013). Modeling Institutions Affecting Smallholder Agriculture Development in Iran from the Perspective of Experts with Emphasis on Non-Governmental Institutions. Rural Development Quarterly, 5 (2), pp. 133-156. [In Persian]
Vitikainen, A. (2004). An Overview of Land Consolidation in Europe, Nordic. Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, pp. 25-43.
Zhou, J. M. (1999). How to carry out land consolidation an international comparison, European university instttute department of Ecnomics, eui paper working eco, 1-99, pp. 1-17.
Ziari, K. (2014). Schools, theories and models of regional planning and planning. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. fourth edition.